by Thomas, Noémie and Pippa
Introduction
Dating back thousands of years, the First Nations, upon
arrival, staked out land throughout Quebec. They lived off the land and by
advancing through time, they became close to the land which they worked, fought
for and lay their dead upon. In the latter years, when the white men came to Quebec,
they staked out the most fertile and
beneficial land to them which also happened to be the same land in which the Natives
claimed in the first place, obviously for the same reasons. Being more advanced
in society, the white men pushed the natives to wherever they wanted them. Although
this force of displacement is still seen today, we have started to see the
natives finally putting their feet in the ground and standing strongly to
protect their land in which they deserve. Two documentaries were created on
this 270 year old racism act of pushing the Indians and where it ends up
leading to a confrontation. “The
Invisible Nation” and “Kanehsatake : 270 Years of Resistance” are not only
great for giving accurate factual evidence of these happenings but they also
allow the viewer to be taken right to the front lines of these crises and
through pathos, the filmmaker is able to take the viewer off their seat, bring
them right into the action and experience the pain, stress, frustration and anguish in which the Indians and the
opposing sides have to face.
The Invisible Nation
The Invisible Nation is a
Richard Desjardins and Robert Monderie film of 90 minutes made in Canada and
released in 2007. It explaining the Algonquians’ situation. The film explains
in details what they have been through since the English have taken control
over the French.
At first, with La proclamation royale in 1763 guaranteed
the Algonquians a politic autonomy. La proclamation royale says that no white
could go in the Indian Territory without an express permission from the
authority in London. In fact, the proclamation was not made to protect the
Indians but to protect the beavers in that region. For the English, the Indians
are just savages who are in their way. They even made a law about them where
they are considered as child and have no right; la loi des sauvages. To add to this, in 1850, they tried to assimilate
them and to do that, they tried to scare them, telling them about Hell. They
also want to take everything from them. They prevent them to speak their
language and their identity. They numbered them, they do not use their names
anymore but they call them by numbers. Also, if an Indian woman marries a white
man, she will lose her Indian identity as well as her children. They only got
the right to vote in 1960 and as time went on, they lost all their territory
and now live by the Ottawa River. They are living in small reservations, are
marrying between cousins because they do not have a big population. They do not
own their land and most of them do not have much inside their house because
they are poor. Since the English have taken control, they have acted like they
were never there, like they were invisible.
You can read more about here:
http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=b5940e0b-a3b2-4d74-bccb-57360837038b
The main issue in this film is the Algonquians’ rights.
In fact, they barely have rights. The Algonquians have seen everything they had
been taken away from them. They have been subject of assimilation, people they
can not understand trying to take their identity and culture away from them.
They are treated as children and have no rights. The Whites have also taken the
Algonquians’ land and do not have much now. It is a lot for them because the
land is the central place in their culture, history and community.
What made the film special is that there are pictures and
small videos from the past presented in the movie to help us have a better
picture of the situation. There were also interview with a lot of Algonquians
from a lot of reserves to explain what they are living. They are describing
their reserve, how they live and also the major problems they are facing. For
example, there is a reserve where they do not have electricity neither they
have water.
This film teaches us two main things. It teaches us about
the Algonquians and how their transmission of knowledge are by storytelling and
that the land, which cannot be owned, is very important for them and also that
power can sometime be so important for people that they are not respectful
towards others. The White had power over them because of their knowledge and
their firearms and took everything away from the Algonquians. They have also
promised things to them and the Indians believed them. They still remember
today what the White had once promised them but it seems like the Whites seems
to have forgot.
Kanehsatake: 270 Years of
Resistance
The Canadian movie Kanehsatake: 270 Years of Resistance,
was released in 1993. It is a 120 minute long film directed by Alanis
Obomsawin. Kanehsatake: 270 Years of Resistance covers the issues of the Oka
Crisis (1990). It all started when the burial land of the Mohawks in Oka was
going to be taken to have housing developments and a golf course built. There
was a covenant (a formal agreement) on this land, to protect it so that the
First Nations peoples could continue on with their traditions. The Mohawks,
furious, blocked off their area so that the construction equipement couldn't
make its way onto their reserve. The mayor of Oka asked for it to be removed,
and because they denied, he then called in the SQ (Surete du Quebec). The SQ launched
tear gas and grenades into the Mohawk reserve followed by a gun fight resulting
in Marcel Lemay being killed. The SQ then started blocking off roads and
forming their own barriers. The Mohawks decided they were going to barricade
the mercier bridge so that there would be no Montrealers entering their
territory, this caused problems for the non-Aboriginals of Oka who as a result
couldn’t leave. The protesters at this point, asked for full sovereignty
(supreme power or authority in the state).
The SQ was clearly not helping the
situation move forward, so Robert Bourassa called in the help of the RCMP
(Royal Canadian Mounted Police) and the Canadian Armed Forces. After many
problems with the RCMP and Canadian Armed Forces against the Mohawks, the
blockade finally ended on August 29th 1990. The protesters continued until
September when they then surrendered as well, by dismantling their guns and
walking forth into the midst of the armed forces. In the end, the golf course
and housing development plans were cancelled. Read More about it here :
http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/oka-crisis/.
Canadian film director Alanis Obomsawin
has a very unique way of presenting her information in this film. There are a series of interviews from the
mohawks and people from the non-Aboriginal community. Obomsawin captured the
moments which would have been indescribable and unbelievable really, if not
seen with one’s own eyes. She put together a montage of video from the Mohawks
perspective. The film was very unbiased because it demonstrated what was really
happening and there was no glorifying of any party in particular. She taped
what was happening then and there for people to watch all over the world. Read
more about why she decided to make this movie here
http://www.cbc.ca/archives/categories/society/native-issues/general-21/alanis-obomsawin-behind-mohawk-lines.html
.
This film is special because it relates
to the topic of the week- Nations and Communities- in our class: Documenting Myths
with Sylvain Duguay. The movie Kanehsatake: 270 Years of Resistance
demonstrates to societies that by invading the Mohawks territories, they were
ruining the traditions and communities of the mohawks. The tradition, history
and community of any culture takes place in the central area, the Land they
value. The Mayor of oka, Jean Ouellette, wanted to exploit the land that the
Aboriginals lived on. He made Colonialist and Racist decisions by attempting to
have control over the Mohawks land with the drive to make profit, while looking
down upon the Mohawks for having a different set of cultural values. It is important to accept every race even if
one doesn't agree with their morals and values. Obomsawin’s film educated
viewers of self-determination and land claims through solidarity, the unity or
agreement amongst individuals. The Mohawks did what they could when what was
happening was unfair, just like in John Locke’s “Right to Revolt”, “The right
to fight applies to civil societies when: The law cannot be effectively
exercised; There are threatening
circumstances of threatened arm; The administration of the law is corrupt, or
employed to commit violence and injury; The rules for election are tampered
with.”
Reflection
We can learn not only about Indians but also about
ourselves in both films. They are very instructive and teach us about our past.
In both films, we can feel the emotions the Indians have. We can see how much
they are angry now, how sad they are. They were the first here and have been moved
away. They have been treated like children for so long. They have been promised
things that they still do not have today. The government still ignoring them
today and still wants to take things away from them, like seen in the first
film, Kaneshatake: 270 Years of Resistance when they wanted to take another
part of their land to make a golf course. In both films, we can observe that
power can be so important to people that they can act inhumanely. We can also
observe that equality is still very present. Still today, Indians do not have
the same rights as us and it should not be that way.
One can relate the problems in this film and even what is
happening today in many countries. Something close to home that we could all
relate to is how the students have been fighting with the education prices in
Quebec for a while now. Two years ago there were many protests because they
wanted to be heard and have the rights given to them. The films we watch open
out eyes to issues we've never heard of, they are a tool for us to not repeat
all of the wrongs that have happened in the past. We can all help and get
involved by joining organizations, signing petitions and even going out to the
protests if we feel like what's going on in our world is wrong.
The filmmaker, Alanis Obomsawin, in Kaneshatake: 270
Years of Resistance really reaches out to the viewers through a pathos method
of presenting the situation in which the natives were in. With the hand held
recorders, live visual recordings of the faces of some of the saddened natives
were able to be used to pull the audience into the film, trying to make them
feel that of what the Natives felt through their resistance. The audio was also
key in reaching out to the pathos side of the audience as we were able to hear
the cries of anguish and anger, and the different tones of each and every
individual which was truly a perfect example of their feelings. Another great
aspect of this Documentary in which the filmmaker did an excellent job in
fulfilling was merging the two stories, each from one side of the barricade
into one story. This is not only an effect that cannot even be acquired in real
life but it left the audience with un-biased footage from both sides of the
argument which let the audience decide which argument was more agreeable to
them. Alanis Obomsawin validated and strengthened
her documentary through the pathos aspect of her film. With the use hand help
film recorders and audio recordings, live accounts of the event were able to be
derived from both sides of the barricade allowing a un-bias account to be
presented to the audience. Another method of publicizing this resistance that is going on with the natives was through a tour by Neil Young, a popular
Song writer and artist. More information can be observed from the our at: http://www.honorthetreaties.org/
Conclusion
Although it may seem as if we have reasonable reasons to
drive Indians off of their land, there are many different aspects of the issue
that must be studied before any form of physical actions should be taken place.
I believe one area in which the government dealt with the issue in a horrible
fashion was through the film “Kanehsatake: 270 Years of Resistance”. As the SQ
did not have enough force to hold back the natives, the Canadian army was
called to power to aid in the control of the first nations. The government
seemed to treat the natives as enemies rather than individuals who are getting
their land revoked from them for no justifiable reasons. I think we need to
learn from this situation and not brutally force anyone to a place in which
they don’t wish to be. Especially when it comes to people who claimed the land
first and there is no beneficial reason to rip up an emotionally connected
burial ground to build a golf course which could have been built somewhere
else. We should treat the natives with more respect than ourselves and debate
in a more humane fashion
Kanehsatake was a very,very good documentary showing the real insiders look of the Oka Crisis that showed military and police brutality and how extreme the military and SQ got for such a simple and straight-forward conflict over their land and the mayor of Oka's idiotic plans for a golf course.
ReplyDelete-Samantha
This documentary was really intruiging. It really exposed how bad the police's behaviour is against peaceful people. They only knew one way of moving them which was to be physicaI .I also found it really interesting because it gave me some knowledge on Oka. I honestly didn't know about Oka at firstand the fact that it is located in Montreal made me feel kind of silly in type of way.I also like the fact that they didn't give up on their lands and were there to fight to death even though the police were throwing gas at them.
ReplyDeleteAbdel Ndiaye
I have always been intrigued by the natives. Their will is extremely strong, maybe even too strong. Ghandi once said "Better to live humbly for a cause than to die for it." I am a very strong believer in that saying so it is very hard for me to relate to how the Indians feel. How can you be so proud of your country, a piece of land, that you would die for it? It may have to do with their spirituality. They strongly believe in the interconnection between man and his land. Either way, we definitely have some values that we can learn from these people.
ReplyDeleteThis documentary was not what I expected. I was shocked with how the government of Quebec handled this situation. They seemed so iresponsible and the way the policed behave, that was truly disgusting. I knew a little bit of the Oka Crisis but high school but watching this film I learned so much more on how the natives had really just tried hard to keep their land, without being so violent. Something I truly adored about the native people is that they were so dedicated to their land and people. They weren't going to let anything come in their way. I think that is something people nowadays are missing is fighting for the things they believe in.
ReplyDeleteSharon
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteKanehsatake is one of my favorite documentary films that we watched in class. I don't think there is a reasonable reason for people to be forced to leave their home, no matter the tradition or culture or beliefs. This film was very interesting but sad to see the real owners I'll say, of this land forced to give up their land so that something that is not important be built. I loved the way the First Nation People stood up for what the believe in, they make us understand that we should stand up for what we believe in.The First Nation People are very interesting and I think that they shouldn't be treated like how they being treated.
ReplyDeleteDebora Kumson
I really enjoyed watching this film, I never knew about this situation in Québec, and was a real eye opener to how we actually treat the first nations. How the government did not even reason with the first nations, and sent in the army to keep them in their area and not even letting family members and friends go see them on their land. Also the camera used also gives you the impression of actually being with them, also looking at other journalist takes out the effect that the whole film is filmed by a journalist.
ReplyDeleteFranco D