Friday, February 14, 2014

3 - The Power of Fear

by Jacob, Merna and Juliana


Fight or Flight?

Fear is a strong, uncontrollable, unpleasant emotion caused by actual or perceived danger or threat. Lately, fear has become a value in our daily life. Our life, that should be full of joy and peace, is actually full of threat, terror, and fear. We tend to fear anything and everything these days. We fear death, losing a job, or even losing a beloved one but, what we fear the most is fear itself. When we were young, our parents used to scare us so we would listen to what they have to say. They would tell you “hey don’t do this. Don’t get yourself into trouble, respect the rules” and if we didn’t listen we were punished. They were thinking that they were protecting us, but actually they were feeding us with fear so we would learn how to deal with real life. In reality, fear is part of your circulatory system.  So your heart feels it, your brain understands it, your lungs breathe it and your body can’t live without it. Thus, fear is controlling your thoughts and blinding your vision, it becomes easy to deceive and manipulate you. In Bowling for Columbine and Fahrenheit 9/11 we see good examples of how fear is used to dominate and impose authority over innocent people just for the benefit of the elite.

Michael Moore has been accused of inciting fear in Americans with his documentaries. His outspoken dislike for American politics and culture have made him notorious filmmaker and his bias is also apparent on his website.

 

Bowling for Columbine

 (Michael Moore, 2002, USA, 120 min)

The film “Bowling for Columbine” is an American documentary written, directed and narrated by Michael Moore. He investigates the Columbine High School Massacre on April 20th 1999 and relates the cause of it to the history of violence in the United States and the maltreatment of firearms. He shows that obtaining a gun and ammunition is relatively easy. For example, a bank gives free guns to customers who open a bank account with their branch. He also shows how easy it is to walk into K-Mart and buy all the ammunition one could possibly imagine. He uses statistics and interviews many people such as Charlton Heston, former president of the National Rifle Association, a few Canadian teenagers in a Taco Bell parking lot and two students from the Columbine shooting to get public opinions on firearms and their relevance in society. He even interviews singer-songwriter Marilyn Manson, suspected “cause of the Columbine shooting” to get his point of view. Furthermore, he uses his signature sense of angry humor to persuade the audience and present his stand on the matter. 

  


Upon viewing of the documentary film “Bowling for Columbine”, the main issue raised by Michael Moore is that the level of gun control in the United States is out of hand, and that you cannot place firearms in the hands of civilians that are scared because they will use them recklessly. For example, Michael Moore interviewed a blind man and he said he felt most comfortable with a rifle in his hands. Another example is throughout the entire animated clip of the U.S.’s history, the character narrating the animation spoke about how the “white man” was scared, which is why they had wars and enslaved African Americans.  

However, Michael Moore’s way of presenting the documentary was somewhat biased. He only showed the audience what they wanted to see, that owning guns are dangerous and it creates problems rather then solutions for the population of America. A good example of this is when he interviewed Charlton Heston. Moore went through many questions with Heston, and one of his answers was completely outrageous. The question asked was “Why has the U.S. ended up as the country with the highest number of gun-related killings on earth?” and Heston’s response went something along the lines that the United States is very multicultural and it has to do with the mixed ethnicity (black people). This answer is completely ridiculous because Canada is just as multicultural as the U.S. but is much more peaceful. 

The weekly topic this week was Rhetoric. Rhetoric is the art of organizing a discourse in order to express oneself, to convince or to persuade people. In our class discussion, we spoke about the three forms or rhetoric, Logos, Ethos and Pathos. Logos is the reasoning to construct an argument. Michael Moore presented a few numbers and facts in his documentary but could have added a little more to prove his point. Ethos is believing someone because of their credibility, or of their social position. The director had some really justifiable arguments but at the same time, they were biased. For example, to prove to the audience that many people possessed a firearm in the United States, he interviewed the owner of a shooting range. Finally, Pathos is appealing to our emotions to alter the viewer’s judgment. Michael Moore did a splendid job of this, especially with one of the scenes close to the end. Right after he interviews the former president of the NRA, he places a picture of the six year old girl shot by another six year old, at the end of Charlton Heston’s driveway to signify that having a gun rally in the same town, several days after her death was not okay. These concepts apply directly to the film because that is all the director was doing. He was trying to persuade his audience into believing guns cause problems rather than create solutions.

Fahrenheit 9/11

(Michael Moore, 2004, USA, 122 min)

The film "Fahrenheit 9/11" by Michael Moore criticizes the Bush administration and its reasons for invading Iraq. Throughout the film Michael Moore emphasizes the fear that Bush used to fuel the ill will of American citizens toward Iraq.  Moore uses the film to expose what he sees as the fear propaganda that the Bush administration spread with lies and exaggerations about the role Iraq played in the September 11, 2001 tragedy at the World Trade Center in New York City. Micheal Moore uses a voice over narrative to give the audience his perspective on the events that lead up to and followed after 9/11. The film unfolds with Moore stringing together interviews with both high-ranking individuals in government and everyday citizens, as well, he adds a variety of facts relating to significant dates and events. All of these elements come together to tell his opinion of how and why 9/11 happened. Moore also shows footage that is meant to shock and outrage the viewer, such as that of soldiers who are seriously wounded being carried into a hospital in Iraq.

                                                         
 He uses all three rhetoric styles to make his point. He uses logos to persuade us when he includes film footage of real events and interviews with both everyday people and experts who were associated with the events. Everything he uses, however, is all to show his bias against Bush. For example, he includes video footage of President George Bush and his father George Bush senior, shaking hands with members of Osama Bin Laden's family over oil deals to suggest that the Bush family had a relationship with the Bin Laden family when it suited them. He uses ethos to portray George Bush as incompetent. For instance, he shows Bush's reaction to the news that two airplanes have flown into the Twin Towers in New York City. As Bush sits for nine minutes, Moore refers to as "a deer in headlights". Moore questions why Bush does nothing, and narrates what he thinks could be going through Bush's mind based on his inaction and the look on his face.  His narrative rhetoric  makes Bush appear to be an inept leader. 

                                                   
While he uses the ethos and logos, Moore's rhetoric address is mainly pathos; he uses scenes that appeal to alter the viewers sense of justice and need for safety, ultimately convincing the viewer that Bush is a threat to them.   For example, the film opens with darkness and the sounds of sirens and screams of 9/11 to grab our attention and heighten our emotions. Immediately, we feel the fear and terror of that event. He uses the power of the tragedy to boost American patriotism, and then he points the finger at Bush as the cause for the tragedy of 9/11 and the war that followed. 


Moore's opinion is the center of the film and many people criticized him for his bias. His rhetoric pathos style is an attempt to manipulate us. His rhetoric pushes us to consider whether or not his accusations against Bush are true. Even if some parts are clearly exaggerated, we are left thinking that there must be some truth in it because the footage he uses comes from real events and he interviews credible people. Throughout, Moore's message is anti-Bush and he twists many well-known film clips to prove his view of the Bush administration. Many of the scenes and/or dialogues are edited to help him make his point. Everything was carefully chosen to show one side of the story and he only uses the answers that agreed with his perspective. 


Manipulative media 

The aim of these two documentaries is to present the psychology of American people and American society as well. By revealing the inequality lived by most of the Americans and the kind of education they receive at school, we see how Moore is trying to show how power and politics use moral beliefs and strict political education to create fear. He uses a political fear of the unknown - such as Islamic fundamentalism and terrorism - to ensure that Americans follow the plan of the government. Corey Robin, an American journalist and political theorist, says in his book “Fear: the History of Political Ideas”: “...if we deprive of these surrounding myths, if we deprive the fear aroused by 9/11 of political ballast, perhaps we will see more clearly what our assumptions have long obscured the repressive fear of elites experienced by American men and women as they go to work, learn in school, haggle with officials, and participate in the organizations that comprise our associated life. Perhaps how fear of terrorism is being used to recognize the structure of power in American society (25)”. We are humans and we easily forget. Thus, by creating an inequality within Americans, we tend to go in a long journey where only fear remains in the heart.

Documentary films present a type of art used to portray the truth according to the vision of the filmmaker. Michael Moore used rhetoric to present the idea of how governments use fear to get public support. For example, in Bowling for Columbine, Moore based his epistemology on weak ethos just to deceive and persuade the audience to convince them with his opinion. For example, he interviewed Matt Stone, an animator and screenwriter, who had nothing to do with the crime but he was useful for Moore's purposes. The main technique in this film is pathos. He manipulates our emotions so we feel pity, sadness, happiness and even feel horrified.

On the other hand, Fahrenheit 9/11 is more credible and supported with strong ethos, pathos and logos. This is because Moore interviewed credible people like congressmen and women. In addition, his arguments were supported with documents that prove his claims. For example, he proved that George Bush didn’t finish his military recruitment in the air force guard. Like Bowling for Columbine, he used his technique of appealing on people emotions to attract their attention.

After watching these movies, you realize that you shouldn’t trust the media. It would be best to keep your eyes wide open so you avoid their manipulation. The filmmakers are trying to provide us with the “truth” of a situation, an event or even of politics but that truth will always be according to their point of view and their culture and values. In our world, truth is always relative depending on how you want it to be. In 2004, after the attack on Iraq a lot of documentaries came out talking about the war of Iraq such like Control Room which was talking about how fox news was telling Americans that they were fighting terrorism and liberating the Iraqi people of a dictator, while Aljazeera was reporting to Arabs that the liberation was a disaster and was imposing American dominance over the Iraqi nation.


Providing a New Way to see the World
Media is a double-edged weapon; it is used to elevate the human being or to captivate and cage each one of us. It is important to be aware of what is happening around you, but it is also important to understand and negotiate.  Movies are not made to only please, but are also made to provide us with a new understanding of the world we are living in.
 


  Fear is gripping! Anthropologists have studied the fight or flight response that our ancestors needed
in order to survive. Michael Moore is showing us how that survival instinct can be used to benefit the agenda of others in his films. Ironically, he is also advancing his own agenda through his rhetoric style.  His criticisms of government and leadership have resulted in much controversy. We must be aware of his bias and reflect on the message we are given. At the same time, we must recognize that it is important to scrutinize what we are told by world governments. Julian Assange has shown us that we have much to learn about hidden agendas. He is the founder of Wikileaks which is a website that releases private documents with the goal of exposing corruption, unethical  practices, and questionable protocols by institutions around the world.





                                                                         
 Picture Credits:
 http://science.howstuffworks.com/life/fear2.htm
www.stefan-rohner.net  
sylarthemaverick.blogspot.com 
 www.dailyhiit.com
www.carrickbaptist.ie 

14 comments:

  1. Great entry!

    There is one ambiguity that I noticed while reading it. Michael Moore himself is denouncing the possibility that media may vastly spread false or extremely biased information, but his films are essentially just as biased. As you mentioned, I would say at least 60% to 70% of the arguments he used in Bowling for Columbine were Pathos based. Michael Moore is in fact using arguments that appeal more to emotion in order to appeal to a broader audience and in turn, he gains notoriety in the world of cinema as well as making huge sums of money. This made me think... we should be just as aware of the information we ingest from media as the information Moore is giving us.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Michael Moore is an expert in rhetoric. He demonstrates to us how easy it is to have your thoughts warped. When someone is exposed to something, and it makes them feel a certain emotion, their idea about something can be more easily changed.
    *I think that Michael Moore proves to us how guns change people. For example, when he interviewed the man in the farm, the man told him that he sleeps with a gun under his pillow. People are not born with a want to sleep with a gun. Things have to happen to them to make them be afraid and therefore act that way.

    ReplyDelete
  3. My grand-father was a hunter and had guns in the house. Yet, we were not afraid. I guess that is because he kind of grew up that way, we thought it was normal. Also, my grand-father was not afraid of anything but that was not the main reason why we still felt safe in his house. In fact, I think that we can also fear someone who is not scared. Someone who is not scared will not be scared to shoot someone else. Fear is not the main reason, it can explain the reason why people have guns in their house, but it does not explain why these people actually shoot other people. The act of shooting someone can be caused by fear but it can be controlled. Those people probably missed something in their life. I think fear is a reason why people have guns but fear can not be an excuse. I don't think fear is the reason why people commit an act like this.
    NoƩmie

    ReplyDelete
  4. Bowling for Columbine was an intriguing movie to watch because it showed the difference between the United States and Canada. The film demonstrated how fear could be a factor in the lives of individuals. In the U.S, they are more scared and protective of their families and themselves because of the gun laws while Canada is not as scared because they leave their doors open which is seen when Michael Moore opens random doors to see if they were locked and they weren't. Michael Moore is an interesting man but he is very bias and he only demonstrates one side of the story. He doesn't always show the entire background behind a story as i learned at the beginning of the movie. When he went to the bank to buy the gun, they gave it to him right away but actually what the audience doesn't know is that it actually takes 3 weeks for them to give it to a customer because they have to do background checks and make sure the person is using the gun for good use. The striking parts of the documentary were that almost every family and person owns a gun in the United States and the story about the 6 year old killing another 6 year old with his uncle's gun was sad and hard to believe that this could happen. Fear is uncontrollable and so are guns.
    -Franco C-G.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Bowling for columbine" directed by Micheal Moore is a very informative documentary using all three forms of rhetoric which include, logos, pathos, and ethos. An example of logos would be when Micheal Moore included many numerical facts such as the amount of deaths by guns in different countries. Micheal Moore interviewed many different people throughout his film because he believed their word was credible evidence. Micheal Moore's use of Ethos by Interviewing people was beneficial in getting his point across because he was able to present them in way which created a global meaning to his film. Our emotions were played with throughout the film by showing videos, facts, and giving rhetorical questions for the audience to ponder. Micheal Moore is very good at getting his point across but he tends to only show his side of things, and I agree with a lot of the points he has. People should not own guns if they do not hunt, serve in the army, or are police officers. I have no need for a gun in my household so should anyone else if the do not fall into those three cases? I enjoyed reading this report on the documentary film, it had many good points and facts brought up that complement the theme of the film.
    -Timothy Nolan Bailey

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bowling for Columbine informs us about a very illogical issue present in the United States. Michael Moore cleverly proves his point through the 120 minute film. I really enjoyed the interview with Marilyn Manson, explaining how he’s depicted as “the poster boy of fear” because it’s easy to label him as the cause of trouble in our society because of his music and appearance. It’s frustrating to hear about the NRA holding rallies right after shootings, basically spitting in the victims' faces. Overall, one of the best movies I've seen. It leaves you with an unsettling feeling; a need for change.

    -Philippe Cook

    ReplyDelete
  7. Michael Moore is very good at using rhetoric. He convinces us that many people in America keep guns in their house because they are scared. I think that if the news and the government didn’t bring so much fear into the people of America, this wouldn’t be such a big problem. He is very biased because he mostly shows us what will help us agree with what he has to say. He uses ethos a lot, for example at the end when he shows the picture of the young girl who was killed. This makes us feel sad about what happened and also supports Michael’s arguments about the guns laws. I watched another documentary by Michael Moore called Roger and Me, about the closing of many general motors’ factories in Michigan. In this film he also uses the same techniques in trying to convince us that this caused a lot of economic problems in Michigan. But he is also very biased in what he shows and who he interviews.
    -Sereena

    ReplyDelete
  8. In the film “Bowling for Columbine”, Michael Moore clearly expresses his anger at the way of fear and violence in the United States. The film includes great interviews with the president Chalton Heston, the heavy mental musician Marilyn Manson and some other various people. Some of the interviews were very shocking. Michael Moore’s point of view is very biased. He raises his points and he knows in the beginning of the film what he has to say. The filmmaker uses images and statistics to compare the number of gun homicides in different countries. We see that the United States has the most shocking count of the level of gun control. Michael Moore wants to convince us that guns are dangerous and he wants to make people think about important issues that are going on in our world. “Bowling for Columbine” is a fascinating and thought provoking film.

    - Agele.T

    ReplyDelete
  9. I think that Bowling for columbine is both amusing and sorrowful documentary film about the gun violence in America. In the film Michael Moore shows us that how frequently people shoot at one another in America as compared to Canada. The main cause of violence in USA is ethnic integration. Michael Moore had included much footage in which we see real life people being shot. The footage from security camera of Columbine high school massacre was the most frightening one. By using this kind of footage and interviewing people who suffered from gun violence Michael Moore tries to explain people to stop selling guns unnecessarily and live peacefully. Uzma

    ReplyDelete
  10. When I first viewed the film, I thought it was a quite accurate documentary of the gun related tragedy. As we looked at the techniques he used to film and create the film, I realized that after all, it wasn't all too accurate. Through using a selective audience to interview, filming selective subjects and putting much weight on his personal opinions, I think Michael Moore had much influence on the viewers from his personal opinion. With that aside, the footage that seemed to be legit was quite shocking. To see the footage from the security cameras of columbine high school was distressing. It really allowed me to put myself in that cafeteria at that very moment, hiding under desks in the extreme levels of anxiety as people screamed and fled for their lives. Although this footage was hard to watch, I think Michael Moore, appealing to our emotions was very wise to insert these clips within the documentary.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I really liked this blog it was very informative and interesting. The opinion given in the beginning about it being bad to be hidden from our mistakes, I completely agree with it. I find that if we don't learn from our mistakes, then we wouldn't have learned anything at all and so it is wrong for the media or our parents to tell us that we shouldn't do a particular thing or that the media to scared us by showing us only terrible things on television about what could happen. Michael Moore does an amazing job at putting fear into people's minds but I honestly think he does it for a good reason. Guns were created for one purpose and one purpose only and the fact that he used death as an example of the weapon's consequence , which is the only consequence that is cause by it, it gives him full rights to scare people and show them the reality of the situation. So I guess in a way striking fear is a good thing but not to an exaggerated extant.

    - Jessy Sosa

    ReplyDelete
  12. The film Bowling for coumbine was a good movie, well that's what a thought. It shows some very good interviews with some of the victims from the school shooting and they tell us what it was like. I found that very eye opening to hear what they had to say. Also in the movie is shows that Canada has as manny guns as the US does but there news is always bad news so its like they live in fear and it was weird to find that out. but the blog overall was good i liked the conections you guys made with the pictures i founf they went well with the blog.
    -Wesley Hayman

    ReplyDelete
  13. The blog was very interesting and the film Bowling For Columbine had many good parts and the really showed the true reality of guns in the United states, making connections and also comparing the United States to other countries like Canada. Michael was also good at getting true eye opening interviews from teachers and other students from columbine; this made the film more shocking to the viewer. Michael also goes out of his way when going to k-mart to try and stop them from selling the specific type of ammunition, and succeeding.

    Franco D

    ReplyDelete
  14. Great Entry

    Bowling of Columbine was personally my favorite documentary film.Michael Moore did a great job by exposing the United States of America yes,we can all say "we're not from America so why bother?"but the thing is we got to care in order to make the world a better place.The film made me see the big gap between the two countries on how Can is way less dangerous than Usa.Moore also did an excellent job by showing live footage from the shooting,interviews from the witnesses and statistics I think it was a big factor In the success of the film because It opened the eyes of audience and feel the pain of the poor people .The great film "Bowling of Columbine" basically shows how one object can take so many life in a blink of an eye

    Cheik Abdel Ndiaye

    ReplyDelete

Your comments should address at least one of the following topics:
- The content of the entry (if there is anything you’d like to add, to precise, to nuance, to correct);
- Your understanding and experience of the films (ideas or emotions you didn’t have a chance to share or develop fully in class);
- Some comments on other films (fiction or non-fiction), which you feel are relevant to the entry and the weekly topic;
- Links to your personal experiences.

Don't forget to include your name!

(The comment feature is reserved to members from the Documenting Myths course - thank you for respecting this...)