Friday, May 16, 2014

14 - The Power Of Art

The Power Of Art
By: Chantal, and Debora 

             As stated in the Oxford dictionary, art is “The expression or application of human creative skill and imagination, typically in a visual form such as painting or sculpture, producing works to be appreciated primarily for their beauty or emotional power:” It is the artists interpretation of the world around them. This is shown in the movies “Wasteland” (L. Walker, K. Harley, J. Jardim, 2012, Brazil, 99 min.) and the movie “Born Into Brothels” (Zana Briski, Ross Kauffman,2004, India, 85 min.) The use of art is used to make a difference in the world around us by trying to show us that the artist’s perspective is right.

Waste Lands Trailer



               The documentary "Waste Lands" focuses on a large group of people who are caradores (or pickers.) A caradore is a person who picks out recyclable elements from mixed waste wherever it may be temporarily accessible or disposed of.  These people are typically found within Third world countries and they normally live in low-income neighborhoods, the slums or squatter settlements. In this film, they pick the garbage from Jardim Gramacho, the world's largest landfill. Vik Muniz (an artist) begins by showing the landfill and uses people who work there to show not only what they do, but the lives they live outside the recyclable materials. This was an important aspect in the film as it shows us that they are not living easy lives and the littlest things make a difference to them. We learnt about 7 main people; Tiaõ, Zumbi, Suelem, Isis, Irma, Valter and Magna. Each person led different lives and started within the wasteland for different reasons.

We first learnt about Tiaõ, who was inspired by texts that Zumbi brought his managed to convince people around him to start a company and is now the president of ACAMJG (the Association of Recycling Pickers of Jardim Gramacho). Many people talk about how much of a wonderful leader he is. You can see it first hand by the things he says and by the way he acts. He asks for recognition to help get support for his company this shows that he is strong in his beliefs. He ended up on a talk show to talk about his experiences with Vik and his company. Many people believe that he could be the next president.

Zumbi has been working in the landfill since he was 9 years old due to his parents dying. However, he is very intellectual. When he sees a book, he does not add it to be recycled but he keeps it so that he can read it and use it later on. He started a program where he lent library books in his shack for people to borrow and give back later on. The same concept as a library. He has now opened up his own library with 7000 books, computers and a learning center.

Suelem is 18 who started working at the landfill when she was 7. She has 2 kids and believes that she can eat anything. It is good as long as it doesn't kill her. She is proud to be a picker. She says it is a more respectful job than if she were to choose to prostitute herself. When the documentary finished, she found a man who is supporting her and her family and is staying at home with her children (her dream job.)

Isis was in a relationship with a married man and was heartbroken at the beginning of the film because he chose her over him. She got a tattoo on her leg in memory of him. She had 2 children, one son and one daughter. Her son died and her daughter was taken away by her husband and they abandoned her. She hates picking garbage and after she finished working with Vik, she says she is never going to go back.

Irma is the chef of the landfill. She finds food that is still good and cooks meals for the workers. After working with Vik, she opened up her own restaurant however; she left it to go back serving the workers. She claims she likes the sense of family.

Valter is the vice president of the company ACAMJG. He is an old man who is well known for his inspirational saying "99 is not 100". He has not had an education however is still very intelligent. He enjoyed his time explaining to people why it is so important to make a difference and recycle. Unfortunately, he died before Vik got the chance to make his picture.

Magna is the last character we looked at. She came to the landfill after experiencing hard times with her husband. She once walked onto a bus and called people out for making faces at her due to her smell. She is a bit ashamed of working in the landfill. After working with Vik, she lives with her 11 year old son and works at a pharmacy.

Vik took each person’s picture and made the models made their portrait out of garbage. He then sold them and donated the money to the company. This allowed each person to feel more important. They also had epiphanies and changed their lives because of it. 

            This week, our class focused on the power of art. We learnt that art often makes us feel alive and it also offers a way to show our understanding of what is happening in the world around us. It is normally about interpretation and does not contain a real truth. This documentary shows different perspectives:
Close vs. far
First world vs. third world
Art and life
Rich vs. poor
          Dignity was also a large focus in the class. We saw in the film that the caradores; even though they do not have the most respected and well-paying jobs, they are still able to contain their dignity since they have more respect for themselves than if they were to prostitute themselves or steal from other people. They are doing something that no one else wants to do however; it is an honest, respectful and cooperative job.

           One of the things that stood out to us most is how art can change someone's point of view. I have heard many people who said they thought garbage pickers were just people who ended up on drugs and were not able to find good jobs. However as we were shown in the movie, this is not always the case. The people we were shown were hard working people who unfortunately had problems that were out of their control. Mostly due to their parents death. They were just unlucky. 


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/filmreviews/8345947/Waste-Land-review.html 

Born Into Brothels Trailer





            The documentary “Born into Brothels” is by Zana Briski and Ross Kauffman. It is a 2004 American documentary film which is about an hour and twenty three minutes. The idea of this documentary came about when Zana Briski a documentary photographer went to Calcutta to photograph prostitutes. During her visit, she befriended the children of the prostitutes. The children were very curious about what she was doing so she decided to teach them about photography and she gave each child a camera. The children took pictures that show their perspectives of their surroundings. Briski showed most of their works in the film. Briski and Kauffman recorded the classes that they had with the children as well as their daily life in the red light district.
           
            Briski chose eight children to help get education and they were: Avijit, Manik, Puja, Shanti, Gour, Tapasi, Suchitra and Kochi. Each child had different personality. The first issue that came up was about Suchitra. Suchitra lost her mother so she lived with her aunt who wants to send her to Bombay to work “in the line,” (prostitution) because all the girls in her family are in the line. The second issue was about Avijit. Avijit is the most talented among the children. He love drawing; he states: “I like to draw pictures to express what’s on my mind.” He is a great child but he was born in an unfortunate city. His father is addicted to smoking and his mother lives in the village where no one actually cares about her. During the film, we found out that his mother was burned in a fire. Afterward Briski tried to get the children into good school but no school would take them because of their background. She was even asked to do HIV test for all the children. Luckily for them the test came out negative. Briski wanted all of them to get into boarding school so that they will be out of the red light district. She was able to get Kochi, Puja and Shanti into a boarding school called Sabera Foundation. Briski had to sell some of the work of the children to help them with their education and Avijit got the chance to go to Amsterdam to represent all the other children. When he returned, he chose to enter the Future Hope School. Suchitra’s aunt refused to let her leave the brothel, Manik’s father would not let him go to school, Gour still lived at home and hopes to go to university, Puja’s mother withdrew her from the Sabera school because her clients offered her a lot of money for Puja, Shanti left Sabera on her own accord, Kochi chose to stay at Sabera and Tapasi ran away from home and went to the Sanlaap school for girls.

            This film is special because it is about the future and the life of prostitutes’ children and also it is very rare. It is special also because it shows how some children are unfortunate that even them getting education is a very big problem for them because of their background. We got to see and tried to understand the perspectives of the children barely in their teens.

            In Waste Land, we learned that we should reduce our usage of things because if we minimize the things that we use there will not be a lot of garbage and there might not even be a landfill. We learned how art can change people’s life and how it brought happiness to the group that Vik Muniz worked with. This film made us talk things that we don’t normally talk about. For instance, we started talking about where our garbage goes and who takes care of them. We learned about how the people that worked at the landfill had each other’s back as in Born into Brothels. The children that Zana Briski worked with and taught had each other’s back. For instance, in Waste Land the people donated blood when Zumbi got hurt because they lived like one family. In Born into Brothels, Gour looks out for Puja, he even wishes he could take her away from the brothel. In both films we learned that we should stand up for each other and also that we are very fortunate to be where we are right now.

            The filmmakers had different types of strategies but they also had one common strategies and that is using the insiders’ point of view. Vik went to Jardim Gramache purposely to make a documentary film about the people and the place but Zana went just to take photograph of the prostitutes so her documentary came along when she befriended their children. Vik did not give the camera to the people but Zana on the other hand gave out cameras and that brought out more about what the children see.

            Waste Land challenges us to reduce the usage of things. We got to see and learn about the life if those that work in the landfill. We also see the power of art. In Born into Brothels, we really see that we are very privileged to be born in Canada and not at a place like the brothel. It challenges us not to take things like education for granted because there are a lot of people out there that wishes to have a quarter of what we have.

             In our class discussion, we learnt a lot about how art can be a great impact in the life of people. Art brings out what we think and how we sometimes see things. We learnt that we all have creative potential in us so we just have to tap into it. In Born into Brothels, we see how art in a form of photograph brought out the imaginations and the dreams of the children that Zana Briski worked with. Art opened their eyes to really capture their environment, education etc… We also learnt in class that art is about our experiences and in Born into Brothels we see that most of the photographs taken by the children relate to their daily life experience in the red light district. Some of the pictures of one of Zana’s student, Avijit, showed the environment that he was in.


            Waste Land speaks to us more because Deb comes from a place where you find garbage all around the city. Some of the environments are polluted because of that and they do not really do anything about it because they are used to it. It speaks to Chantal more because she has seen first hand during mission trips people from Haiti who had potential and were on their way to get a job then have their opportunities ruined when the tsunami occurred.  When it comes to Born into Brothels, we would say that these children were born in an unfortunate place. It is very sad to see children that have dreams and great ambitions not get the opportunity to go to school or anything of the sort because of the places that they live and their parents occupations and life choices. 

              In conclusion, both documentaries have explained how art can make huge differences in the artists and the audiences lives. It allows the audience and the artists to explain how they see the world. These documentaries have shown us that through art, we are able to change our worlds. 





Friday, May 9, 2014

13 - Fighting Aids

By Sharon & Sean 

Silence=Death
Act Up


Introduction:

  The film watched in class was “How to Survive a Plague” by David France in 2012, it was 110 minute movie that had some graphic scenes of the gay community suffering with Aids in New York and how a group formed called Act Up decided to stop watching their love ones die. They decided to stand up and fight together. The other movie watched within our group was “We Were Here” by David Weissman and Bill Weber in 2011. Within this 90minute film we also see how the gay community in San Francisco suffered through this awful period of time and how the people worked together to help someone die more peacefully. During these two films there are many issues raised between discrimination towards the gay community, government response to the crisis of Aids and learning about Aids. Aids was something relatively new at that time, due to the fact the disease never seemed to be discovered till that point but Aids has been around since mankind. 

How to Survive a Plague:

  The theme this week was “Global Activism” which related to the film because the issues brought up within this film had eventually made an impact on the world. It also shows people from the state acting up together to stop the discrimination towards the gay community. The issues that were raised throughout this film were discrimination, government response towards the crisis and the activist. Also, we saw the challenges the group Act Up had to face just to create awareness and a treatment. 

  Discrimination was shown throughout this film very often when we saw the homophobic people react to the gays when they were out publicly fighting for help. When Peter was doing an interview on what Act Up was all about and the efforts they had put to become successful. The two host seemed very judgmental to Act Up's movement especially homophobic, since it seemed they were more against the idea of homosexuals. We also saw how badly the police had treated them, sometimes they were just being so violent just because they weren't supportive in their cause because of their sexuality. Another thing which seemed so frustrating was how George Bush was handling the situation. He was completely homophobic, the audience could see it clearly. He just did not put any importance to the fact that so many young men were dying everyday. He seemed so heartless. Also when one of the men were talking in the congress and how someone had said it was their right to have freedom of speech. He was like yes but if they aren't disturbing everyone else. It seemed like by forming this activist group, Act Up, it ended up being the best thing these people did. They eventually were able to have medication they could take to slow down their process.

  Aids became something people could live with just could not cure for the moment. This film is special because the director uses the media clips and how they presented the view on Aids. We see video clips on what the president at that time thought about Aids. The viewers saw all the protest and riots going on. We could see the activist going to all the pharmaceutical companies saying they would not sit around but were going to force them to let out those drugs they needed. In class we discussed similar topics as in how the activist had responded by causing awareness, creating social services and doing medical practices. How they organized themselves and how they took control to have less discrimination against themselves. 

  Concepts such as learn, fight and love also helped Act Up take more stands because then people saw how much they learnt, fought and their love to another. The people catching the aids started off by learning everything they could possible about the disease, how they caught it and the process of how the bacteria was going to kill them. They sometimes even knew more then the doctors but they never knew too less. That created them to ask the right questions because they knew the same information and wanted to find solutions to how to cure this disease. When it came to fighting, well the people fight this organization never backed down, knowing the consequences of fighting they still did it. This lead many to go to jail but they knew that if they did not fight, that nothing was ever going to be done about this terrible disease. These people were dedicated, since they knew they were ill and dying yet they flew on planes to talk to over cities. They went outside having riots, knowing police would abuse them.  Nothing stopped Act Up from making sure they would succeed. Lastly, their love brought the furthest in this war against government, society and pharmaceutical companies. They all came together as a whole, even the lesbians were standing up there with their gay men, taking a charge. They had compassion for each other, love, warm and so much more. They were dedicated to another knowing the fact that some would not make it for the medication, they still did it for the future generations to have a treatment. That way not everyone had to die a miserable death that they were about to face.  



We Were Here:

  During this film, we see how the gay people in Castro, San Francisco were dealing with Aids in their city. Castro was known for having a city full gays, it was their community and all of a sudden these men living here were dying within weeks from these spots all over their bodies. Some were turning blind, while other had gotten pnuemonia. Some lost weight quickly and others seemed to be ageing rapidly. Media took it as if it was some gay disease but over time they realized this was Aids. 

  Watching this documentary, the audience can see how the theory of Aids had developed and it is a sexually transmitted disease. In this film, they are interviews of people who survived the terrible disease and how they talked about the loved ones who did not make it. They talked about their story throughout this tragic time. The difference with this film compared to "How to Survive a Plague" is they are regular member of society, that did not carry this disease that took a charge to help the men that did have Aids. Some had volunteer hours to make these people have someone to spend their last few days with to make it seem less terrible, like a companion. Such as one nurse talked about what she watched this people go through and how sometimes they knew so much more then her. She said they had their research, they knew what they were about to go through. This brought up one of the ideas of the learning process. How these patients made sure they knew it all, that way no one could lie to them about anything. They had the knowledge on the disease that was about to take away their life. 

  Act up ended helping these suffering people more then anything when they had started their protest against government. Government did not do much other then close down their clubs. They thought the clubs in Castro were not sanitary enough. The issues they faced were discrimination and people who just did not want to help. Like they were trying to get help from government and it just was not working. They knew they weren’t going to make it so they did their best to fight for the future generation to not have to go through the same tragedy like them. This caused these people to fight for what they believed in. In Castor the lesbians decided to have other donate blood because their boys needed it. This led people to come together to fight for the men dying but this also created these men to fight. Not only to fight for their life but for others. Just like one of the men who were interviewed had said, some people became lab rats for these new medications just to try to find some treatment to help. They knew if these treatments were successful not only would they make through it but that everyone they loves would too. They all took chances to win this battle with Aids. They fought as hard as they could to survive.

  These public affairs caused awareness for the future men and women who were capable of catching this disease, so that maybe they had a chance to still live their life and not die at a young age. They wanted to find a treatment or even a cure to just help someone live through it, that way these young women and men did not have to be ill at all times. They did not have to suffer the pain or the scaring/spots left behind from Aids. The gay community in Castro also wanted to aware other how to be careful from Aids, which lead them to promote safe sex. By promoting safe sex to the people around them, to their community and especially younger generation show the love they had for another. The gay men wanted to help another to make no one had to lose anyone they loved, since many of them watched their friends, brothers, family members and their boyfriends die. It was this one disease after every person in this one happy community that lost every soulful person. Love is what created so many people to get through Aids and to even fight so hard for a treatment. 

This film was special because we also saw the live interviews with these people and what they lived through. How they saw their loved ones pass away. One man had lost three of his boyfriends. He said at one point he never knew how he made it through the many that didn't. He was glad he did though because lead him to tell all the stories those men couldn't, the world needed to hear the stories they could not witness. This film brought many emotions out because they showed many graphic scenes and interviews with people who lost too many friends. Fits in the the topic “Global Activism” because we see how this impacts the world and how active these people were within their own community. They took their problem in their city worldwide because this was not the only city of people dying from Aids. The world had to be aware of all that was happening and how they could prevent people from catching Aids. How they were slowly creating test that let people check if they had Aids and if they did not how to prevent not catching it. They were activist because these men took it out on the streets fighting hard for that they believed in. They did the best they could for make sure no one else was going to die young from Aids.  

We Were Here Website

Reflection:

Aids is a disease caused from HIV. It causes your body’s immune system to shut down and make it easier for you to attract other sickness’s. ‘We were here’ takes a look at the aids epidemic in San Francisco. HIV dates back to the late 19th century  in west-central Africa but was only first recognized in the 1980’s. Maintaining the perfect balance between the political and the personal, this is a documentary that will make you feel as well as think. The aids epidemic changed hundreds of thousands of lives. Everyday loved ones and family members would be killed and there was nothing anyone could do about it. 

 There is not one single documentary that could really explain the devastations faced through this period. Living under our parents roofs, eating our parents food, having school being paid for, getting gas money for your car. We don't always realize how extremely lucky we are. We don't think of what else is out there and how much people can suffer. These documentaries focus in on what the filmmakers wanted us to see; the sick, the help, and the drug companies. For a long time the government did not care at all about “these people”. They were different and nobody wanted to be seen or to see two men kissing. It just didn't make sense and more then 95% of the population outcasted them. So when they all started to get HIV positive a lot of people were happy to get rid of them. If someone does not believe in homosexual relationships does not mean they should agree with human beings suffering. This world needs less judgments, love is love, does not what who or what you love. It should not impact the world on who one is loving. 

  We learn a lot by watching films such as these. The biggest message we were able to grab from both these films was the perseverance to never give up. Act up, always let your messages and demands be heard. Without the pursuit of these young men and women we would not be where we are today in the fight against HIV’s. Silence = Death! The world is not a perfect place but we know that by uniting and fighting for what we believe in, we can accomplish wonders throughout. Before watching these two documentaries we did not know much on Aids or ever heard anything on these events. That shows us just how much media and news hide more from us and how much there is out there for us to learn on our own. “When faced with the unimaginable, they did the impossible and fought back!’’ - (How to survive a plague intro.)

Act Up Website

Conclusion:

In conclusion, "We Were Here" and "How to Survive a Plague" both represented very well the Aids epidemic in San Francisco and New York. Fighting for every last bit of their lives, the lesbian and homosexual communities came together to change the world as we know it. Through countless years of protesting and watching loved ones die, these activists stood up for what they believed in! They are a lost generation with a great deal of success. They show us to pursue our dreams and regardless of the consequence at some point, the work we put in makes a huge difference. These two documentaries will remind you that there are way bigger problems in our world and that without the freedom of speech, our culture would not be where we are today.


Act Up. Fight Back. Fight Aids. 

Sunday, May 4, 2014

12 - Kanehsatake: 270 Years of Resistance Nations and Communities

by Thomas, Noémie and Pippa

Introduction
            Dating back thousands of years, the First Nations, upon arrival, staked out land throughout Quebec. They lived off the land and by advancing through time, they became close to the land which they worked, fought for and lay their dead upon. In the latter years, when the white men came to Quebec, they  staked out the most fertile and beneficial land to them which also happened to be the same land in which the Natives claimed in the first place, obviously for the same reasons. Being more advanced in society, the white men pushed the natives to wherever they wanted them. Although this force of displacement is still seen today, we have started to see the natives finally putting their feet in the ground and standing strongly to protect their land in which they deserve. Two documentaries were created on this 270 year old racism act of pushing the Indians and where it ends up leading to a confrontation.  “The Invisible Nation” and “Kanehsatake : 270 Years of Resistance” are not only great for giving accurate factual evidence of these happenings but they also allow the viewer to be taken right to the front lines of these crises and through pathos, the filmmaker is able to take the viewer off their seat, bring them right into the action and experience  the pain, stress, frustration  and anguish in which the Indians and the opposing sides have to face.



The Invisible Nation
         The Invisible Nation is a Richard Desjardins and Robert Monderie film of 90 minutes made in Canada and released in 2007. It explaining the Algonquians’ situation. The film explains in details what they have been through since the English have taken control over the French.                                                                                                           
           At first, with La proclamation royale in 1763 guaranteed the Algonquians a politic autonomy. La proclamation royale says that no white could go in the Indian Territory without an express permission from the authority in London. In fact, the proclamation was not made to protect the Indians but to protect the beavers in that region. For the English, the Indians are just savages who are in their way. They even made a law about them where they are considered as child and have no right; la loi des sauvages.  To add to this, in 1850, they tried to assimilate them and to do that, they tried to scare them, telling them about Hell. They also want to take everything from them. They prevent them to speak their language and their identity. They numbered them, they do not use their names anymore but they call them by numbers. Also, if an Indian woman marries a white man, she will lose her Indian identity as well as her children. They only got the right to vote in 1960 and as time went on, they lost all their territory and now live by the Ottawa River. They are living in small reservations, are marrying between cousins because they do not have a big population. They do not own their land and most of them do not have much inside their house because they are poor. Since the English have taken control, they have acted like they were never there, like they were invisible.  You can read more about here: http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=b5940e0b-a3b2-4d74-bccb-57360837038b
            The main issue in this film is the Algonquians’ rights. In fact, they barely have rights. The Algonquians have seen everything they had been taken away from them. They have been subject of assimilation, people they can not understand trying to take their identity and culture away from them. They are treated as children and have no rights. The Whites have also taken the Algonquians’ land and do not have much now. It is a lot for them because the land is the central place in their culture, history and community.
            What made the film special is that there are pictures and small videos from the past presented in the movie to help us have a better picture of the situation. There were also interview with a lot of Algonquians from a lot of reserves to explain what they are living. They are describing their reserve, how they live and also the major problems they are facing. For example, there is a reserve where they do not have electricity neither they have water.
            This film teaches us two main things. It teaches us about the Algonquians and how their transmission of knowledge are by storytelling and that the land, which cannot be owned, is very important for them and also that power can sometime be so important for people that they are not respectful towards others. The White had power over them because of their knowledge and their firearms and took everything away from the Algonquians. They have also promised things to them and the Indians believed them. They still remember today what the White had once promised them but it seems like the Whites seems to have forgot.



Kanehsatake: 270 Years of Resistance
            The Canadian movie Kanehsatake: 270 Years of Resistance, was released in 1993. It is a 120 minute long film directed by Alanis Obomsawin. Kanehsatake: 270 Years of Resistance covers the issues of the Oka Crisis (1990). It all started when the burial land of the Mohawks in Oka was going to be taken to have housing developments and a golf course built. There was a covenant (a formal agreement) on this land, to protect it so that the First Nations peoples could continue on with their traditions. The Mohawks, furious, blocked off their area so that the construction equipement couldn't make its way onto their reserve. The mayor of Oka asked for it to be removed, and because they denied, he then called in the SQ (Surete du Quebec). The SQ launched tear gas and grenades into the Mohawk reserve followed by a gun fight resulting in Marcel Lemay being killed. The SQ then started blocking off roads and forming their own barriers. The Mohawks decided they were going to barricade the mercier bridge so that there would be no Montrealers entering their territory, this caused problems for the non-Aboriginals of Oka who as a result couldn’t leave. The protesters at this point, asked for full sovereignty (supreme power or authority in the state).
        The SQ was clearly not helping the situation move forward, so Robert Bourassa called in the help of the RCMP (Royal Canadian Mounted Police) and the Canadian Armed Forces. After many problems with the RCMP and Canadian Armed Forces against the Mohawks, the blockade finally ended on August 29th 1990. The protesters continued until September when they then surrendered as well, by dismantling their guns and walking forth into the midst of the armed forces. In the end, the golf course and housing development plans were cancelled. Read More about it here : http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/oka-crisis/.
        Canadian film director Alanis Obomsawin has a very unique way of presenting her information in this film.  There are a series of interviews from the mohawks and people from the non-Aboriginal community. Obomsawin captured the moments which would have been indescribable and unbelievable really, if not seen with one’s own eyes. She put together a montage of video from the Mohawks perspective. The film was very unbiased because it demonstrated what was really happening and there was no glorifying of any party in particular. She taped what was happening then and there for people to watch all over the world. Read more about why she decided to make this movie here http://www.cbc.ca/archives/categories/society/native-issues/general-21/alanis-obomsawin-behind-mohawk-lines.html .
        This film is special because it relates to the topic of the week- Nations and Communities- in our class: Documenting Myths with Sylvain Duguay. The movie Kanehsatake: 270 Years of Resistance demonstrates to societies that by invading the Mohawks territories, they were ruining the traditions and communities of the mohawks. The tradition, history and community of any culture takes place in the central area, the Land they value. The Mayor of oka, Jean Ouellette, wanted to exploit the land that the Aboriginals lived on. He made Colonialist and Racist decisions by attempting to have control over the Mohawks land with the drive to make profit, while looking down upon the Mohawks for having a different set of cultural values.  It is important to accept every race even if one doesn't agree with their morals and values. Obomsawin’s film educated viewers of self-determination and land claims through solidarity, the unity or agreement amongst individuals. The Mohawks did what they could when what was happening was unfair, just like in John Locke’s “Right to Revolt”, “The right to fight applies to civil societies when: The law cannot be effectively exercised;       There are threatening circumstances of threatened arm; The administration of the law is corrupt, or employed to commit violence and injury; The rules for election are tampered with.”

Reflection
            We can learn not only about Indians but also about ourselves in both films. They are very instructive and teach us about our past. In both films, we can feel the emotions the Indians have. We can see how much they are angry now, how sad they are. They were the first here and have been moved away. They have been treated like children for so long. They have been promised things that they still do not have today. The government still ignoring them today and still wants to take things away from them, like seen in the first film, Kaneshatake: 270 Years of Resistance when they wanted to take another part of their land to make a golf course. In both films, we can observe that power can be so important to people that they can act inhumanely. We can also observe that equality is still very present. Still today, Indians do not have the same rights as us and it should not be that way.
            One can relate the problems in this film and even what is happening today in many countries. Something close to home that we could all relate to is how the students have been fighting with the education prices in Quebec for a while now. Two years ago there were many protests because they wanted to be heard and have the rights given to them. The films we watch open out eyes to issues we've never heard of, they are a tool for us to not repeat all of the wrongs that have happened in the past. We can all help and get involved by joining organizations, signing petitions and even going out to the protests if we feel like what's going on in our world is wrong.
            The filmmaker, Alanis Obomsawin, in Kaneshatake: 270 Years of Resistance really reaches out to the viewers through a pathos method of presenting the situation in which the natives were in. With the hand held recorders, live visual recordings of the faces of some of the saddened natives were able to be used to pull the audience into the film, trying to make them feel that of what the Natives felt through their resistance. The audio was also key in reaching out to the pathos side of the audience as we were able to hear the cries of anguish and anger, and the different tones of each and every individual which was truly a perfect example of their feelings. Another great aspect of this Documentary in which the filmmaker did an excellent job in fulfilling was merging the two stories, each from one side of the barricade into one story. This is not only an effect that cannot even be acquired in real life but it left the audience with un-biased footage from both sides of the argument which let the audience decide which argument was more agreeable to them.  Alanis Obomsawin validated and strengthened her documentary through the pathos aspect of her film. With the use hand help film recorders and audio recordings, live accounts of the event were able to be derived from both sides of the barricade allowing a un-bias account to be presented to the audience. Another method of publicizing this resistance that is going on with the natives was through a tour by Neil Young, a popular 

Song writer and artist. More information can be observed from the our at: http://www.honorthetreaties.org/



Conclusion
            Although it may seem as if we have reasonable reasons to drive Indians off of their land, there are many different aspects of the issue that must be studied before any form of physical actions should be taken place. I believe one area in which the government dealt with the issue in a horrible fashion was through the film “Kanehsatake: 270 Years of Resistance”. As the SQ did not have enough force to hold back the natives, the Canadian army was called to power to aid in the control of the first nations. The government seemed to treat the natives as enemies rather than individuals who are getting their land revoked from them for no justifiable reasons. I think we need to learn from this situation and not brutally force anyone to a place in which they don’t wish to be. Especially when it comes to people who claimed the land first and there is no beneficial reason to rip up an emotionally connected burial ground to build a golf course which could have been built somewhere else. We should treat the natives with more respect than ourselves and debate in a more humane fashion